Sunday, April 25, 2010

ACTS AND COURT CASES ON AMERICAN MULTICULTURALISM



ACTS AND COURT CASES ON AMERICAN MULTICULTURALISM

Instructor: Jonathan B. Moore

Spring 2010


We’ve covered our materials until the Jewish American so far. I understand that we are facing some difficulties and distortion in understanding material during the class. Many students shown their best effort in catching the idea and I wrote this note in order to help those people, unless you were too lazy. I would like to add some information to complete this note and I will honor to welcome your critics and additional info.

African American

~1862/1863 the emancipation of proclamation stated by Abraham Lincoln to free slaves in US particularly the south society. This frees nobody anyway.

~Jim Crow Laws established the idea in limiting certain groups’ rights to vote, participate in government, and even travel post-Civil War.

~1855 Plessey vs. Ferguson established the idea of separate but equal. The problem is: not really equal.

~1919-1932 the Harlem Renaissance slowly African American developed the new African American movement that refers to the flowering of African American intellectual life. (ps: it pronounced ‘renasans’)

~1933 the great depression in US, it simply ended the Harlem renaissance.

~1959 Brown vs. Board Education, finally defined that separate is not equal.

~1964 Civil Rights Act, defined that public discrimination is illegal. This also supports other ethnic group and other minority groups.

Native American

~1861 Indian Reservation established

~1830 the Indian Removal Act, prior to this time European argued that Indian do not have sovereignty. This effectively did away with all treaties and contracts signed between the United States and the Native American.

~Trail Of tears, the US government decided to move Indians from Mississippi areas to Oklahoma on forced march, many people died.

~1890 Battle of Wounded Knee, the Indian massacre. Indian hunting that killed almost man, woman, and children oh Indian. The US soldier systematically moved to kill Indian.

~1979 The American Indian Religious Freedom Act, It was the first time the US government through Supreme Court of freedom to practice Native American religion.

Hispanic American

~1941 the Fair Employment Practices Act, argued that discrimination was not allowed in the workplace.

~1954 Hernandez vs. Texas, a supreme court case that Hispanic are not black, but they have equal determination to black people. Dealing with this issue also work together with the 14th amendment of equal protection under the law. This also stated that Hispanics were included in the Fair Employment Practices Act.

~1950 Initial Civil Rights, the farm workers lead by Ceasar Chavez organized people together to demonstrate the government asking for the Hispanic worker rights.

~1954-1958 Operation Wetback, deported 3,8 million Hispanics, Immigration Naturalization Resource send them back to their origin.

~1980’s The Sanctuary City, the federal government decided who can be the legal citizen. Depending on there are 39 states in USA. They working similarity mind with the Hispanic Chamber of commerce I guess. This also develops barrio as the cultural center. Here, illegal immigrants are usually not deported from these even if they are arrested for other crimes.

~The proposition 227, did not allows bilingual education in public school of California. Prior to that time, the legal obstruction would mostly impact Hispanic families with children on America’s west coast.

Puerto Rican American

Mr. Moore concerned this subject to a movie (The west side story 1961), just watch it anyway.

~1917 The Jones Act, enabling migration for Puerto Rican free from all immigration barriers to US. Puerto Rican is US citizens.

Chinese American

~1854 People vs. Hall, this states that Chinese immigrants could not testify in American Courts.

~1862 Police Tax, during the gold rush, Chinese workers in California essentially asked to pay US$ 2.50 per month.

~1875 Page Act, banned the immigration by undesirables such as women and criminals to US.

~1882 Chinese Exclusion Act required that this ethic group to reapply for citizenship and made it much more difficult for new members of the group to enter the US.

~ San Francisco China Town Quarantined

~McCarran Walter Immigration and Nationality Act

~US vs. Wong Kim

Jewish American

~May Laws The major cause of emigration from Tzarist Russia (which included modern day Lithuania) in the late 1880s. Jews were forbidden to settle outside the towns and shtetls (townlets); Deeds of sale and lease of real estate in the name of Jews outside the towns and shtetls were canceled; and Jews were prohibited from trading on Sundays and Christian holidays.

~1981 Nuremberg Laws unofficial and particular measures taken against Jews up to 1935. The Nazi leaders made a point of stressing the consistency of this legislation with the Party program which demanded that Jews should be deprived of their rights as citizens.

~1948 Israel Establish the nation of state

~1983 Jewish Faith open law

~Blue Laws usually referred to as Sunday closing laws, prohibit certain types of commercial activity on Sundays.

By Anisa Caesar, Salatiga April 25th 2010

EllioT


EllioT

A Thematic Film Paper Response in E.T. The Extra Terrestrial


As a deeply moving story of the special friendship that develops between Elliott, a very accepting and open-minded lonely young boy living in a suburban California community, and a wise visitor from another planet who becomes lost on Earth makes E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial is an everlasting movie that Hollywood and the world ever had. The story between Elliot and ET contains archetypes of the major characters in the film that would be explained in limits below.

The first overview that delivers the extra terrestrial's character introduction happens slowly through out the first few scenes of the movie. In the first scene, ET has been stranded in a new world, knowing no one. In his first contact with the human species, ET was chased, frightened, and scared into hiding. These are some reasons why I categorized ET as the foreigner in archetypal character. Not also as a foreigner, but later on after met Elliot ET became the noble savage as the new creature. Even though he has seen lack in (earth) culture but ET has goodness and willingness to exist, in addition he also learns easily.

That Elliot and ET feel, do and think the same thing after their first contact, I saw the complexity character in Elliot in his connection with the extraterrestrial. Elliot was a boy who has lost his father due to a parental separation gains a great relationship with an extraterrestrial. Kids develop a sense of empathy as they grow and this story shows how Elliot does. It concludes that Elliot fits into the child character in his wisdom and not superficial, but as I dig deeper, I found that he is more than just the child. When the authorities kill the alien, it is clear that the boy is dying, too. So, the story manages to show the giving up of one’s life for another and the giving of a loving spirit rather than just to be a reluctant hero in Elliot’s attempts to help his extra-terrestrial companion contact his home planet so that he might be rescued.

Finally, after ET went with his spaceship, the final moment in the story comes in the form of a rainbow, a promise that things will be all right. Through his contact with the extraterrestrial, Elliot will grow up with greater compassion, wisdom, and capacity for emotion in his life. Besides the main characters archetypal, I am sure that there are many things that the scholars can dig and develop through this great film.


Credit

E.T. The Extra Terrestrial. Dir. Stephen Spielberg. Perf. Dee Wallace, Henry Thomas, Robert MacNaughton, Drew Barrymore. Universal Pictures, 2002. VCD

By Anisa Caesar, Spring 2010


McCarthyism as Americans Pro and Contra at 1950s

McCarthyism as Americans Pro and Contra at 1950s

An celebratory paper in completing the American Popular Culture course assignment

By Anisa Caesar Intan Firdausi, Rr.

November 2009

The Dominant World Power. For American liberals, the experiences of the 1950's formed their concept of the American past and contributed to the popularity of a consensus history. They came to celebrate the American past and the beneficence of American political and economic institutions. The anti-communist should be placed in their wide historical setting, the condition of American capitalism at the end of the war as it pursued its geopolitical interests at home and abroad. US imperialism and capitalism itself came out from the war as the dominant world power. As it launched the challenge contain of communism internationally, it needed as well to execute workers politically at home and make that they would not threaten its global designs.

There are some additional factors contributed to McCarthyism; extending back to the years of the First Red Scare inspired by Communism's emergence as a recognized political force and more subtle forces encouraging the rise of McCarthyism.

A fact from the new liberals, there is a fearful of being labeled radical, that further would silent their difficulty for social change. Increasingly, they stressed their confrontational anti-Communism became even more fearful of public debate and provoked public. These factors deeply influenced their view of the developing McCarthyism in early 1950's. Because liberals had come to identify the national interest and rationality of American. They are some reason why American liberal be able to accept the new ideology so uncritically, necessity and sensibility that they were ill-prepared to understand the McCarthy phenomenon that I collected from reading.

Is There Something that People Gain from this Cultural Phenomenon? Joseph McCarthy is a US senator of Republican for Wisconsin. Joseph McCarthy's interest with the current cultural phenomenon that would stand his name began with a speech he made on Lincoln Day, 9th February 1950 to the Republican Women's Club of Wheeling, West Virginia. McCarthyism born as the politically motivating practice of making claims of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence. Nevertheless, McCarthyism does not misplace as it end in 1954 because the term is also now used more generally to describe reckless, unsubstantiated accusations, as well as demagogic attacks on the character or patriotism of political adversaries. Therefore McCarthyism was a period of intense anti-communism in the United States primarily from 1950 to 1954.

During this period people from all ways of life became the subject of aggressive hunts that often based on inconclusive or questionable evidence. Aggressive hunts means many thousands of Americans were accused of being Communists or communist sympathizers and became the subject of forceful investigations and questioning before government or private-industry panels, committees and agencies. The biggest impact in summary is many people suffered loss of employment, destruction of their careers, and even imprisonment.

In fact, spying and Communist Party membership were not identical categories. From approximately 50,000 party members in the war years, only about 300 were involved in spying. Some members refused to reveal knowledge when approached for information; others used carelessness in the company they kept; while others convinced themselves that the information they leaked was intended chiefly for Communist Party leaders in New York. As the anti-celebratory of communism, most of the Americans who betrayed their country did not participate because they were blackmailed, needed money or were psychological misfits. They joined in because of a sense of belonging in anti-fascism notion, a commitment to such causes as civil rights and improvement in the lives of the working class.

A Letter that Would Change Your Live Forever. Besides produced some speech, Joseph McCarthy also produced a piece of paper which he claimed contained a list of known Communists working for the State Department. According to Reynold Humphries in Hollywood’s Blacklists: A Political and Cultural History, blacklisting of left-wing writers, actors, directors and producers in the American film industry as official of liberalism. Hollywood executives all played their parts, has had far-reaching consequences, not only for the film industry, but American society and culture as a whole. In 1950s Hollywood raise a host of complex issues bound up with the Second World War, postwar society in the US, American liberalism, the film industry, the Communist Party and the general problems of the American left. Communist Party members in the film industry, according to this argument, were more or less the equivalent of Soviet secret police agents. Humphries approaches certain of these information, and leaves some of the others aside (184).

Blacklists deeply affected the lives of the men and women caught up in them. More than 10,000 people may have lost their jobs. It seems that low number of thrashings administered under slavery. McCarthyism also concern to some specific sector in American society such as social, politics, and culture. The social reforms that never implemented, the diplomatic initiatives that were never taken, the workers who were never organized into unions, the book that were never written and movies that were never made. From my point of view, the condition I have mentioned before implied as the celebration mode (even it seems that they never celebrate anything) that American approach to McCarthyism. McCarthyism clearly played role in the television broadcast at that moment. The blacklist contributed to the unwillingness of the film industry with controversial social or political issues.

In addition, the nation cultural and another intellectual life also suffered. In the late 1950s a group of graduate students at the University of Chicago wanted to have a coffee-vending machine installed outside the Physics Department for the convenience of people who worked there late at night. They started to circulate a petition to the Buildings and Grounds Department, but their colleagues refused to sign. They did not want to be associated with the allegedly radical students whose names were already on the document. Since political activities could get you in trouble, prudent folk avoided them. Instead, to the despair of intellectuals, middle class Americans embraced social conformity. A silent generation of students populated the nation's campuses, while their professors shrank from teaching anything that might be construed as controversial. Meaningful political dissent had all but withered away.

The McCarthyism We Deserve! On the other side, McCarthyism was supported by a variety of groups, including the American Legion and various other anti-communist organizations. One core element of support was a variety of militantly anti-communist women's groups such as the American Public Relations Forum and the Minute Women of the U.S.A. These organized thousands of housewives into study groups, letter-writing networks, and patriotic clubs that coordinated efforts to identify and eliminate subversion. In the identification of traditional symbols of status with pro-Communism, the McCarthy followers, of non-Anglo-Saxon extraction, can gain a feeling of superiority over the traditionally honored groups. Senator McCarthy and his followers felt there was a dangerous subversive element that posed a danger to the security of the country. In January 1954, a poll found that 50% of the American public supported McCarthy, while only 29% had an unfavorable opinion of the senator. American further got attenuation of the reform impulse by diverting the attention of the labor movement as they gain from McCarthyism.

The public fighting McCarthyism occurred at June 1st 1950, Senator Margaret Chase Smith, a Maine Republican, delivered a speech to the Senate she called a "Declaration of Conscience". In a clear attack upon McCarthyism, she called for an end to "character assassinations" and because McCarthyism violate basic principle of US: The right to criticize, the right to hold unpopular beliefs, the right to protest and the right of independent thought. Elmer Davis, one of the most highly respected news reporters and commentators in 1950s, often spoke out against what he saw as the extremes of McCarthyism. On one occasion he warned that many local anti-Communist movements constituted a general attack not only on schools and colleges and libraries, on teachers and textbooks, but on all people who think and write; in short, on the freedom of the mind.

Following the war, support for the Communist Party rapidly declined. In 1956, following the suppression of the Hungarian uprising, three-quarters of U.S. Communists, including many of its most dedicated members left the party. The impact of the McCarthy era was equally apparent in the realm of international affairs. In the mid- and late 1950s, the attitudes and institutions of McCarthyism slowly weakened. Changing public sentiments had a lot to do with this the decline of McCarthyism may also be charted through a series of court decisions. The death of Joseph McCarthy in 1956 also be one of the most important factor causing the end of McCarthyism era.

In conclusion, American and American new liberals were forced to accept McCarthyism as a part of cultural and their politic lives. In this case, celebratory approach of an event or movement seems also can be forced to be accepted. Some of them followed the movement, in opposition to Communism, they join some anti-Communism organization and role the blacklist, people deserve in their McCarthyism and stand for it; others kept on their origin beliefs or did nothing because they fear of the blacklist. Argument against McCarthyism appears as reactions of violation in the human rights, this is called as the anti-McCarthyism or anti-celebratory.

Paranoids of fearing about communists, I have often found it unsettling that what the McCarthies feared in the 1950s is in some respects not so off base today. Moreover, I concerned the changes of people perspectives and public sentiments brings United States of America into the New Liberalism after McCarthyism era.


Sources

Demagogy. Wikipedia, 2009. 24 N0v. 2009


First Red Scare.______________________________


Humphries, Reynold. Hollywood’s Blacklists: A Political and Cultural History. London: Edinburgh University Press, 2008. Print.


McCarthyism. Wikipedia, 2009. 24 N0v. 2009


Rosenberg, John. Neo Anti McCarthyism. Discrimination US, 7 November 2006. Web. 24 Nov 2009.


Schrecker, Ellen. Impact of McCarthyism. Curriculum Units, 1995. Web. 24 Nov. 2009.

Theoharis, Athan. UPPEN Edu Wrinting, 31 May 2007. Web. 24 Nov 2009.

Walsh, David. The Anti-communist Purge of The American Film Industry. Wsws Articles, 4 February 2009. Web. 24 Nov. 2009.


First Red Scare took place in the period 1917–1920, and was marked by a widespread fear of anarchism, as well as the effects of radical political agitation in American society. Fueled by anarchist bombings and spurred on by Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, it was characterized by illegal search and seizures, unwarranted arrests and detainments, and deportation of hundreds of suspected communists and anarchists. (taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ First Red Scare )

Demagogy (also demagoguery) from ancient Greek δημαγωγία, dēmos "people" and agein "to lead") is a strategy for gaining political power by appealing to the prejudices, emotions, fears and expectations of the public — typically via impassioned rhetoric and propaganda, and often using nationalist, populist or religious themes. Taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demagogy


INSIDE EDMUND PEVENSIE

INSIDE EDMUND PEVENSIE

The Chronicles of Narnia; The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe

A paper in completing the Thematic Film course assignment

In the World War era, a son in family usually taking charges of his family in joining the military or as a chief in his family just like in The Chronicles of Narnia; The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe to context it with pro-adulthood. The man versus self conflict that happened to Edmund also had some effects related to how Edmund character’s formed and what archetypes he fixes to. So that, Edmund Pevensie became an interesting character to track down of his advanced information.

The man versus self conflict firstly shown in the movie plot in Edmund as a younger son of Pevensie family conflicting with his older brother, Peter who taking charges of his brother and sisters while their father sent to the war. The growing up Edmund ( Skandar Keynes ) was tried to prove himself as a man, and not a boy bellowing Peter the alpha male anymore. Progressing the adulthood problem that happened to Edmund, it almost made him as an heckler in his attempt of rebellion and when he pretends to not believe in Lucy. Furthermore, Edmund easily trust the White Witch who offered him candies and authority as the king of Narnia in order to get information from him. Afterward, the White Witch asked Edmund to bring his brother and sister to Narnia. Through no curious in the witch’s order, Edmund slowly became a traitor betraying his brother and sisters, he was brought his brother and sisters into Narnia that later would endanger them all. In short, Edmund’s ways to get power finally makes him categorized as a traitor.

Seeing bad results of what he has done, Edmund was going back to his brother and sisters, trying to change his image. In Edmund’s willingness to assist his brother, Peter, on the war against the White Witch’s troops has formed Edmund into a hero. He felt that he did not needs the authority from the White Witch anymore, because he knew that they had prophesied to have rule in the Narnia world. As a result, Edmund’s effort in get his brother and sisters also the whole Aslan’s follower trust in him was changed him into a sidekick for his brother, his sisters, and all people who fight for the bright of Narnia.

To conclude, the rise and down plot of this movie have explained how the adulthood conflicting between the brothers. Relating to the hero definition, the Pevensie children were not realized that they are heroes that have destined to, so that, they were categorized as reluctant heroes. In addition, the adventure in the wilderness also formed each character to the way they use to be, especially Edmund who turned from the dark into the light. As the movie’s tagline said “some journey take us far from home, some adventure lead us to our destiny.”


Credit

The Chronicles of Narnia; The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Dir. Andrew Adamson. Perf. Georgie Henley, Skandar Keynes, William Moseley, Anna Popplewell. Walt Disney Pictures. 2005. VCD.


by Anisa Caesar, Spring 2010



The Archetypal Setting in the Wizard of Oz


A paper in completing the Thematic Film Studies assignment
Spring 2010

A little girl desperately runaway from home and that would be a valuable experience for her. The little girl, Dorothy Gale (Judy Garland) in her domestic problem with her uncle and auntie conflicting to the landlady Almira Gulch, at their farm, surprisingly swept away in a tornado to a place which she would starts her journey then. Some places begun from the introduction plot and Dorothy’s journey in the magical world of Oz contains of three major archetypal settings in the film, they are gate, place and time that will be explained below.
Dorothy came to the magical world of Oz, a place over the rainbow, after a tornado swept her farm away and moved her house to that world. So that, the tornado is kind of a doorway or a gate from the Dorothy origin place into the magical world of Oz. Through this crossroad we could see besides the different of place, the film also shown different part of film. To begin with, the film uses black and white part in pre-tornado (Kansas), then the color part in the magical world of Oz. As we have seen, by the different world, the film has shown diverse in creatures and physical appearance which revealed by the color also how the life was going in Oz.
Since the tornado sent Dorothy to the magical world of Oz, this place is too strange for Dorothy that she realized that she was not in Kansas anymore even she was a stranger in Oz, so what is the magical world of Oz? In my point of view and some information that I got from the film, the magical world of Oz is another world where the witch, wizards and the Munchkind life in a colorful world that the Wizard of Oz (Professor Marvel) said the Emerald city as “the noble city”. Finally I had archetype the magical world of Oz as the wilderness.
Regarding to the thematic film’s terms of archetypal time setting, I categorized the magical world of Oz as “now” of age. Even if the film has shown different color to illustrate the place, as the story going the magical world of Oz did not narrate or explain any indication in the setting of both “long long ago” and “coming of age” at all. Maybe the origin book told in different way, but In short the film story told just about the present time when those all of things happened to Dorothy.
To conclude, the whole things about the tornado, a place over the rainbow and how the story was going completed the Wizard of Oz as an evergreen movie and story ever. The film’s casts perform perfectly even under the unbearable make-up and costumes at 1939, some of them marvelously versatile in three to five roles. Moreover, some of term from the movie has been an inspiration and common terms in daily life.

Credit
The Wizard Of Oz. Dir. Victor Fleming. Perf. Judy Garland, Frank Morgan, Ray Bolger, Bert Lahr, Jack Haley. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Pictures, 1939, VCD.
By Anisa Caesar
March 2010

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Advanced Speaking 1

Anisa Caesar Intan Firdausi, Rr.

ID#A2B008085

Advanced Speaking D


What Makes A Good Speaker is Good Speaker?

Although the values of speaking English is dominated by culture, there is always a chance to be a good speaker for someone who is not a native English speaker. I would like to categorize Mrs. Christine Resnitriwati, one of teacher in our English Department as a good speaker. No matter if she speaking in British dialect or Australian, from my personal perspective Mrs. Christine has qualifications as a good speaker. Firstly, she speaks in right tone pitch, clear pronunciation, and medium volume of voice. Secondly, she focused to her topic with organized grammar. Physically, she does not give much of gesture or movement. Everything is in the right measurement. But there is something that makes her audience paying attention, discipline. In my opinion, Mrs. Christine could involved herself in student personal concealing to improve the student spirit of studying English. It is true that Mrs. Christine experiences both living abroad and active speaking in English affected to her ability. However, I am giving my arguments about Mrs. Christine speaking ability in order to examine good exemplifications of her.